<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sanatatea-telefoanelor &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/sanatatea-telefoanelor/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "sanatatea-telefoanelor"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:22:17 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Telefoanele dauneaza sanatatii?]]></title>
<link>http://dvictor.wordpress.com/?p=463</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dvictor</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dvictor.wordpress.com/?p=463</guid>
<description><![CDATA[oare&#8230; hai sa vedem.
Lasam pentru moment toate sfaturile fashion gen faci riduri de la telefon ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oare... hai sa vedem.</p>
<p>Lasam pentru moment toate sfaturile fashion gen faci riduri de la telefon sau faci cancer pentru ca nu esti trendy.</p>
<p><strong>SAR</strong> - <span class="largebody"> radio wave emissions (ce emite un telefon ca sa se conecteze la retea) </span></p>
<p><span class="largebody">Fiecare telefon are un coeficient. Cel mai ingrijorator este SAR de 2 </span>W/kg - atunci ar fi cazul sa-l vinzi sau sa-l schimbi ca are sigur peste 10 ani vechime.</p>
<p>Nokia o duce cel mai bine in topul asta si am aflat spre tristetea mea, telefonul meu are underanjant 1,11. (adica nu atat de bun) DAR uite ce se mai spune si despre altele:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<thead>
<td>Model</td>
<td>SAR value for use at the ear</td>
<td>SAR value for body-worn operation</td>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/iPhone_Product_Info_Guide.pdf" target="_blank">Apple® iPhone™</a></td>
<td>0.974 W/kg</td>
<td>0.694 W/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.motorola.com/mdirect/manuals/V3i_9504A48O.pdf" target="_blank">Motorola RAZR V3i</a></td>
<td>1.21 W/kg</td>
<td>1.01 W/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://sar.nokia.com/sar/index.jsp" target="_blank">Nokia N95</a></td>
<td>0.42 W/kg</td>
<td>0.60 W/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sonyericsson.com/downloads/W950i__SAR_US_R1a_Multilingual.pdf" target="_blank">Sony Ericsson W950i</a></td>
<td>1.02 W/kg</td>
<td>1.22 W/kg (speech)<br />
1.17 W/kg (data)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!--more-->Da se pare ca daca purtam langa noi telefoanele conteaza. Spre surprinderea mea am aflat ca un telefon samsung(cu clapa) x150 (parca) are<strong> 1.7 W/Kg</strong>. Adica dureros de aproape de limita mare.</p>
<p>Pentru telefoane nokia gasiti o lista completa <a href="http://sar.nokia.com/sar/index.jsp" target="_blank">aici</a>(alegeti direct telefonul, fara tara - ultimele paragrafe)</p>
<p>Pentru restul telefoanelor, incercati un google search cu: SAR value for NUME_TELEFON (in loc de NUME_TELEFON puneti modelul si marca).</p>
<p>Bluetooth-urile sau castile sunt recomandate in orice situatie.</p>
<p>Nu am terminat facultate de profil tehnologic asa ca puteti sa ma corectati cand simtiti nevoia.</p>
<p>PS: bumibum, esti in regula cu al tau ;) mai bine decat al meu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
